openproblem.space·the wiki Sign in to edit
Difference between revisions

is-ought

Revision 231 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Imported from content/12-philosophy.json, curated for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (September 2026).”
Revision 231 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Imported from content/12-philosophy.json, curated for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (September 2026).”

Source +0 −0

Revision 231 as rendered

Hume observed that arguments slide from 'is' to 'ought' without justifying the step. Naturalists try to ground ethics in facts about well-being; others hold that values are a separate category. Aligning AI systems has made the question practical, because it requires writing down what systems ought to do.

Posed 1739, David Hume.

  • The original curation links this problem to AI alignment; the argument for the link has not been written yet.

Sources

Value and reason · Philosophy