openproblem.space·the wiki Sign in to edit
Difference between revisions

p-vs-np

Revision 60 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Imported from content/02-computation.json, curated for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (September 2026).”
Revision 60 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Imported from content/02-computation.json, curated for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (September 2026).”

Source +0 −0

Revision 60 as rendered

Most researchers believe P ≠ NP: that finding is genuinely harder than checking. Three known barriers, relativization, natural proofs and algebrization, rule out whole families of proof techniques, which explains why fifty years of effort have not produced a proof. If P = NP with a practical algorithm, most public-key cryptography would fail and much of mathematics could be automated. The formal-conjectures entry also contains NP ≠ coNP.

Posed 1971, Stephen Cook and Leonid Levin; Gödel asked a version in a 1956 letter to von Neumann.

What would settle it

Lean statement P_ne_NP in formal-conjectures

Prize

$1,000,000 Clay Millennium Prize

Sources

Complexity classes · Computation