openproblem.space·the wiki Sign in to edit
Difference between revisions

jung-van-der-kulk

Revision 266 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__jung-van-der-kulk.md).”
Revision 266 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__jung-van-der-kulk.md).”

Source +0 −0

Revision 266 as rendered

This is the structure theorem behind nearly every plane-specific approach.[1] Because every automorphism of the plane is tame, the plane Jacobian conjecture says exactly that every Jacobian pair is a composition of affine and triangular maps. A plane counterexample would be a Keller map outside this group.

The analogue fails in dimension three. Shestakov and Umirbaev proved that Nagata's automorphism of k[x,y,z]k[x,y,z], in characteristic 0, is wild: it is not a composition of affine and triangular maps.[2] Tameness is special to the plane, as the Jacobian conjecture now is.

  1. ↑ H. W. E. Jung, Über ganze birationale Transformationen der Ebene, J. reine angew. Math. 184 (1942) 161–174. W. van der Kulk, On polynomial rings in two variables, Nieuw Arch. Wisk. (3) 1 (1953) 33–41.
  2. ↑ I. P. Shestakov, U. U. Umirbaev, The tame and the wild automorphisms of polynomial rings in three variables, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (2004) 197–227.