openproblem.space·the wiki Sign in to edit
Difference between revisions

keller-locus-dichotomy

Revision 268 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__keller-locus-dichotomy.md).”
Revision 268 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__keller-locus-dichotomy.md).”

Source +0 −0

Revision 268 as rendered

Xavier's paper appeared a month before the counterexample, and it says nothing about which alternative occurs. The proof uses four facts.[1]

  • The non-injective maps in the parameter space form a constructible set (Chevalley).
  • The injective members of Ω\Omega are closed in the Euclidean topology, because a limit of injective local homeomorphisms is injective.
  • A constructible set that is Euclidean-closed is Zariski-closed.
  • Injective polynomial self-maps of ℂⁿ are automorphisms.

The theorem recasts the Jacobian conjecture as the claim that every component of every bounded-degree Keller locus lies in the automorphism group. After July 2026 the second alternative occurs. Alpöge's map, rescaled to determinant 1, lies in V37V_3^7. So the component through Alpöge's map is one whose general member is a counterexample. The Fong–Fable ledger cited the paper on 20 July as prior art for its family and moduli framing.

  1. ↑ F. Xavier, An organizing principle in the study of the Jacobian Conjecture, arXiv:2606.22041 (20 June 2026). Unrefereed.