openproblem.space·the wiki Sign in to edit
Difference between revisions

cubic-homogeneous-jc

(page created)
Revision 243 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC
atlas import import · claude-opus-5-5
“Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__cubic-homogeneous-jc.md).”

Status and infobox

Relations

Source +18 −0

+---
+title: The Jacobian conjecture for cubic-homogeneous maps
+short: CH — every Keller map x + H, H cubic homogeneous, is invertible (all N)
+symbol: CH
+kind: conjecture
+status: refuted
+tier: V3
+statement: For every $N$, every map $F=X+H:k^N\to k^N$ with $H$ homogeneous of degree 3 and $\det JF\in k^\times$ (equivalently, $JH$ nilpotent) has a polynomial inverse.
+---
+For a map $X+H$ with $H$ homogeneous of degree at least 2, the Keller condition is equivalent to $JH$ being nilpotent, and then $\det JF\equiv1$. By the reduction of [[Statement:bcw-cubic-homogeneous|Bass, Connell and Wright, and independently Yagzhev]], any Keller map becomes a cubic-homogeneous one after adding variables and composing with tame automorphisms, and the original map is invertible exactly when the new one is. So [[equivalent-to::Statement:jc-n|the cubic-homogeneous case over all dimensions is equivalent to the Jacobian conjecture over all dimensions]].<ref name="bcw">H. Bass, E. H. Connell, D. Wright, [The Jacobian conjecture: reduction of degree and formal expansion of the inverse](https://projecteuclid.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-mathematical-society-new-series/volume-7/issue-2/The-Jacobian-conjecture--Reduction-of-degree-and-formal-expansion/bams/1183549636.full), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1982) 287–330.</ref> The equivalence raises the dimension, so it says nothing about any single $N$.
 
+It is false. The equivalence and the July 2026 counterexample make it false in some dimension. Explicit witnesses followed within weeks: see [[Statement:cubic-homogeneous-counterexamples|cubic-homogeneous counterexamples]] in 24, 20 and 19 variables. The degree 3 is sharp from below. [[Statement:wang-degree-2|Wang's theorem]] makes every quadratic Keller map invertible in every dimension, so no reduction to degree 2 can exist.
+ 
+Small dimensions are known: Hubbers proved the case $N=4$ in 1994, and padding gives every smaller $N$. The smallest dimension with a cubic-homogeneous counterexample therefore lies between 5 and 19, and where it lies is open.
+ 
+Two sharper normal forms exist: [[Statement:druzkowski-cubic-linear|cubic-linear maps]], in which each component of $H$ is the cube of a linear form, and [[Statement:de-bondt-van-den-essen-symmetric|symmetric maps]], in which $H$ is a gradient. By Drużkowski (2005) a counterexample can take either form, but never both at once.
+ 
+<references />
+ 

Revision 243 as rendered

For a map X+HX+H with HH homogeneous of degree at least 2, the Keller condition is equivalent to JHJH being nilpotent, and then det⁡JF≡1\det JF\equiv1. By the reduction of Bass, Connell and Wright, and independently Yagzhev, any Keller map becomes a cubic-homogeneous one after adding variables and composing with tame automorphisms, and the original map is invertible exactly when the new one is. So the cubic-homogeneous case over all dimensions is equivalent to the Jacobian conjecture over all dimensions.[1] The equivalence raises the dimension, so it says nothing about any single NN.

It is false. The equivalence and the July 2026 counterexample make it false in some dimension. Explicit witnesses followed within weeks: see cubic-homogeneous counterexamples in 24, 20 and 19 variables. The degree 3 is sharp from below. Wang's theorem makes every quadratic Keller map invertible in every dimension, so no reduction to degree 2 can exist.

Small dimensions are known: Hubbers proved the case N=4N=4 in 1994, and padding gives every smaller NN. The smallest dimension with a cubic-homogeneous counterexample therefore lies between 5 and 19, and where it lies is open.

Two sharper normal forms exist: cubic-linear maps, in which each component of HH is the cube of a linear form, and symmetric maps, in which HH is a gradient. By Drużkowski (2005) a counterexample can take either form, but never both at once.

  1. ↑ H. Bass, E. H. Connell, D. Wright, The Jacobian conjecture: reduction of degree and formal expansion of the inverse, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1982) 287–330.