PCₙ — Poisson endomorphisms of k[x₁…xₙ, y₁…yₙ] are automorphisms
A Poisson endomorphism of Pn is a polynomial map of k2n that preserves the standard symplectic form, so its Jacobian determinant is 1. The Poisson conjecture says every such map is invertible. It is the commutative shadow of the Dixmier conjecture: reducing the Weyl algebra modulo p gives exactly this Poisson structure on its center. Adjamagbo and van den Essen introduced it to split the stable equivalence of the Jacobian and Dixmier conjectures into steps.[1]
The chain
Their United Conjectures Theorem, degree-refined and valid in any characteristic, reads JC2n⇒PCn⇒DCn⇒JCn.[1]
A shorter route skips the Weyl algebra. The cotangent lift (x,ξ)↦(F(x),JF(x)−Tξ) of a Keller map is symplectic, and it is injective only if F is, so PCₙ implies JCₙ directlyn→n.
At n=1 a Poisson endomorphism of k[x,y] is a pair (f,g) with {f,g}=1, which is a Jacobian pair. So PC₁ is JC₂ restated.
Open: PC₁, DC₂, JC₂. Refuted with an explicit witness: PCₙ for n ≥ 3; DCₙ for n ≥ 3; JCₙ for n ≥ 3. Refuted by implication, no witness exhibited: none. Claimed, not yet checked: PC₂ (a counterexample), DC₁ (a proof). Every cell not declared on its page is derived by the atlas from the relations drawn; hover a cell for its reasons. proved refuted, witnessed refuted by implication open claimed (V4) · a ring marks V0 · arrows point from the stronger statement to what it implies
Status
Rank 3 and up are false. The cotangent lift of Alpöge's map is an explicit symplectic, non-injective polynomial map of ℂ⁶.
Rank 2 is claimed false. Long gives explicit R,T,D,S∈Q[x,q,p,z] with R=x(2−3xq), in his convention {p,x}={z,q}=1. The map (x,q,p,z)↦(R,T,D,S) is a non-automorphic Poisson endomorphism whose fiber over (0,81,0,0) is exactly three rational points: (0,0,241,−81), (1,32,96247,−6489) and (−1,−32,96247,−6489).[2] The map is built from Alpöge's, and it is not a cotangent lift: a lift from dimension 2 would need a counterexample to JC₂. The atlas has not re-checked it, because the formula for D involves a degree-23 correction the atlas has not transcribed. The cell is drawn as a claim.
Rank 1 is JC₂, which is open.
Because the implication runs PCₙ ⇒ DCₙ, a false PC₂ says nothing about DC₂.
Adjamagbo and van den Essen gave a third proof, purely algebraic, through the Poisson conjecture, which isolates the symplectic step as its own statement.
Revision 275 · 2026-09-30 05:09 UTC · atlas import (import · claude-opus-5-5 · Claude Code 2.1.280) · “Written for the atlas by Claude Opus 5.5 at the direction of Danielle Fong (content/wiki/Statement__poisson-conjecture.md).” · 1 revision by 1 editor · history